The case involves an application (I.A. No. 8709 of 2024) filed by the Applicant seeking condonation of a 115-day delay in refiling Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2316 of 2024. The Respondent objected to the delay condonation, asserting that the delay was inordinately long and intentional. The Applicant attributed the delay to various reasons, including misplacement of documents by their Delhi-based clerk, technical issues with email, and the need to translate documents. The Applicant and their counsel are based in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, which they claimed contributed to the difficulty in physically inspecting records.
CA Ramchandra Dallaram Choudhary, the liquidator of Anil Limited, filed an application seeking condonation of a 115-day delay in refiling Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2316 of 2024. The delay was attributed to several factors: misplacement of original documents by the Delhi-based clerk, technical issues preventing timely receipt of notifications from the NCLAT Registry, and the time required for translating documents. The Applicant and their counsel are based in Ahmedabad, which they argued made physical inspection of records difficult. The Respondent, Adani Infrastructure & Developers Pvt. Ltd., opposed the condonation, arguing the delay was excessive and intentional. The defects were notified by the NCLAT Registry on 2024-08-12, with a deadline of
…Sign in to view the parties.
Notice was issued in respect of the refiling…
The captioned Appeal…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an application (I.A. No. 8709 of 2024) filed by the Applicant seeking condonation of a 115-day delay in refiling Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2316 of 2024. The Respondent objected to the delay condonation, asserting that the delay was inordinately long and intentional. The Applicant attributed the delay to various reasons, including misplacement of documents by their Delhi-based clerk, technical issues with email, and the need to translate documents. The Applicant and their counsel are based in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, which they claimed contributed to the difficulty in physically inspecting records.
CA Ramchandra Dallaram Choudhary, the liquidator of Anil Limited, filed an application seeking condonation of a 115-day delay in refiling Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2316 of 2024. The delay was attributed to several factors: misplacement of original documents by the Delhi-based clerk, technical issues preventing timely receipt of notifications from the NCLAT Registry, and the time required for translating documents. The Applicant and their counsel are based in Ahmedabad, which they argued made physical inspection of records difficult. The Respondent, Adani Infrastructure & Developers Pvt. Ltd., opposed the condonation, arguing the delay was excessive and intentional. The defects were notified by the NCLAT Registry on 2024-08-12, with a deadline of
…Notice was issued in respect of the refiling…
The captioned Appeal…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.