The appeal was filed by the Suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor challenging the order dated 29.07.2025 passed by the NCLT, New Delhi, Bench-III in I.A. 3611 of 2025. The IA was filed by the Committee of Creditors under Section 27 for approving the appointment of Shri Rakesh Kumar Parakh as the Resolution Professional.
Bikram Bhadur, the Suspended Director of Beoworld Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal challenging the order dated 29.07.2025 passed by the NCLT, New Delhi.
The Committee of Creditors (CoC) filed I.A. 3611 of 2025 under Section 27 for approving the appointment of Shri Rakesh Kumar Parakh as the Resolution Professional.
The appellant challenged the constitution of the CoC, which application was rejected.
The CoC passed a resolution for the change of the RP, which was approved by the impugned order.
The Tribunal found no error in the order dated 29.07.2025.
Sign in to view the parties.
Heard counsel…
Order passed by the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The appeal was filed by the Suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor challenging the order dated 29.07.2025 passed by the NCLT, New Delhi, Bench-III in I.A. 3611 of 2025. The IA was filed by the Committee of Creditors under Section 27 for approving the appointment of Shri Rakesh Kumar Parakh as the Resolution Professional.
Bikram Bhadur, the Suspended Director of Beoworld Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal challenging the order dated 29.07.2025 passed by the NCLT, New Delhi.
The Committee of Creditors (CoC) filed I.A. 3611 of 2025 under Section 27 for approving the appointment of Shri Rakesh Kumar Parakh as the Resolution Professional.
The appellant challenged the constitution of the CoC, which application was rejected.
The CoC passed a resolution for the change of the RP, which was approved by the impugned order.
The Tribunal found no error in the order dated 29.07.2025.
Heard counsel…
Order passed by the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.