The appeal was filed against the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, which admitted a Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor. The appellant contended that the Adjudicating Authority did not issue any notice to the appellant before proceeding ex-parte. The Adjudicating Authority had initially taken up the Section 9 application on August 24, 2022, and directed the respondents to file Vakalatnama, authorization, board resolution, and reply affidavit. Subsequently, on September 19, 2022, the Adjudicating Authority directed to proceed ex-parte.
Bhimsen Apat filed an appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority that admitted a Section 9 application by Kalinga Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. The Adjudicating Authority proceeded ex-parte against Bhimsen Apat, who claims he did not receive proper notice. The Adjudicating Authority first took up the Section 9 application on August 24, 2022, and directed the respondents to file Vakalatnama, authorization, board resolution, and reply affidavit. Subsequently, on September 19, 2022, the Adjudicating Authority directed to proceed ex-parte. Bhimsen Apat instructed an advocate to file Vakalatnama in November 2022. The appellant deposited Rs. 1,16,25,583.01/- as required under Section 9 of the I&B Code, 2016. The appellant also filed an application to recall the order
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority first took the…
The Adjudicating…
The appeal was filed against the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, which admitted a Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor. The appellant contended that the Adjudicating Authority did not issue any notice to the appellant before proceeding ex-parte. The Adjudicating Authority had initially taken up the Section 9 application on August 24, 2022, and directed the respondents to file Vakalatnama, authorization, board resolution, and reply affidavit. Subsequently, on September 19, 2022, the Adjudicating Authority directed to proceed ex-parte.
Bhimsen Apat filed an appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority that admitted a Section 9 application by Kalinga Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. The Adjudicating Authority proceeded ex-parte against Bhimsen Apat, who claims he did not receive proper notice. The Adjudicating Authority first took up the Section 9 application on August 24, 2022, and directed the respondents to file Vakalatnama, authorization, board resolution, and reply affidavit. Subsequently, on September 19, 2022, the Adjudicating Authority directed to proceed ex-parte. Bhimsen Apat instructed an advocate to file Vakalatnama in November 2022. The appellant deposited Rs. 1,16,25,583.01/- as required under Section 9 of the I&B Code, 2016. The appellant also filed an application to recall the order
…The Adjudicating Authority first took the…
The Adjudicating…