The case involves an appeal against an interlocutory order. The appellant claims the order causes hardship in complying with statutory requirements. The appellate tribunal is considering the appeal.
The appellant, Baver Suspension Pvt Ltd, filed an appeal against an interlocutory order. The appellant argued that the order caused hardship in complying with statutory requirements. The appellate tribunal noted that the impugned order was interlocutory and not appealable. The appellant was granted leave to withdraw the appeal and was given the liberty to approach the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for modification or variance of the order.
Sign in to view the parties.
The court issued an…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal against an interlocutory order. The appellant claims the order causes hardship in complying with statutory requirements. The appellate tribunal is considering the appeal.
The appellant, Baver Suspension Pvt Ltd, filed an appeal against an interlocutory order. The appellant argued that the order caused hardship in complying with statutory requirements. The appellate tribunal noted that the impugned order was interlocutory and not appealable. The appellant was granted leave to withdraw the appeal and was given the liberty to approach the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for modification or variance of the order.
The court issued an…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.