This case involves an appeal filed against an order dated 2024-10-01 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Ahmedabad, Division Bench, Court-1. The Resolution Professional's application, IA No.556/NCLT/AHM/2021, was partly allowed and partly rejected, leading the appellant to file the appeal. The appellant sought condonation of a 15-day delay in filing the appeal, claiming lack of knowledge of the order until a week after its pronouncement, citing his status as a vegetable vendor unfamiliar with legal procedures. The appellant argued that the delay should be condoned, referencing NCLAT Rules, 2016, regarding the exclusion of the judgment day in calculating the limitation period.
The appellant, Atul Babulal Prajapati, filed an appeal against an order dated 2024-10-01 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) Ahmedabad. The appeal sought condonation of a 15-day delay in filing. The appellant claimed he only gained knowledge of the order a week after pronouncement, citing his unfamiliarity with legal processes as a vegetable vendor. The respondent, Suhas Dinkar Bhattbhatt, argued the appeal was filed beyond the condonable period and the delay condonation application should be rejected. The respondent stated the appellant was informed of the order via email on 2024-10-09 and 2024-10-23, and via WhatsApp on 2024-10-01. The appellant submitted a medical certificate to support the delay. The court noted the order was delivered on 2024-10-01 and
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
The appellant was…
This case involves an appeal filed against an order dated 2024-10-01 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Ahmedabad, Division Bench, Court-1. The Resolution Professional's application, IA No.556/NCLT/AHM/2021, was partly allowed and partly rejected, leading the appellant to file the appeal. The appellant sought condonation of a 15-day delay in filing the appeal, claiming lack of knowledge of the order until a week after its pronouncement, citing his status as a vegetable vendor unfamiliar with legal procedures. The appellant argued that the delay should be condoned, referencing NCLAT Rules, 2016, regarding the exclusion of the judgment day in calculating the limitation period.
The appellant, Atul Babulal Prajapati, filed an appeal against an order dated 2024-10-01 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) Ahmedabad. The appeal sought condonation of a 15-day delay in filing. The appellant claimed he only gained knowledge of the order a week after pronouncement, citing his unfamiliarity with legal processes as a vegetable vendor. The respondent, Suhas Dinkar Bhattbhatt, argued the appeal was filed beyond the condonable period and the delay condonation application should be rejected. The respondent stated the appellant was informed of the order via email on 2024-10-09 and 2024-10-23, and via WhatsApp on 2024-10-01. The appellant submitted a medical certificate to support the delay. The court noted the order was delivered on 2024-10-01 and
…The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
The appellant was…