The appeal was filed under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by Ashok Tiwari against the Impugned Order dated 21.03.2023 read with Order dated 17.01.2023 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Court IV. The Appellant's application, C.P. (IB)/642(MB)/2022, was dismissed as not maintainable because the default occurred in the period excluded under Section 10A of the IBC, 2016. The Appellant had applied for rectification of the said Order vide filing dated 15.02.2023, which was partly allowed vide Order dated 21.03.2023.
Ashok Tiwari (Appellant) filed an appeal against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, which dismissed his application C.P. (IB)/642(MB)/2022. The NCLT's order was based on the default occurring during the period excluded under Section 10A of the IBC, 2016. The Appellant had disbursed a loan of Rs.1,50,00,000/- to M/s. Tattva Properties LLP (Principal Borrower) for a project in Mumbai, under a Loan Agreement dated 12.10.2020. Tattva & Mittal Lifespaces Private Limited (Respondent) acted as the Corporate Guarantor. The Principal Borrower failed to repay the loan between 15.02.2021 and 15.03.2021, and also failed to provide the agreed-upon security. The Appellant deposited security cheques issued by both the Principal Borrower and the
…Sign in to view the parties.
Loan Agreement between Ashok Tiwari and…
Period during which the…
The appeal was filed under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by Ashok Tiwari against the Impugned Order dated 21.03.2023 read with Order dated 17.01.2023 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Court IV. The Appellant's application, C.P. (IB)/642(MB)/2022, was dismissed as not maintainable because the default occurred in the period excluded under Section 10A of the IBC, 2016. The Appellant had applied for rectification of the said Order vide filing dated 15.02.2023, which was partly allowed vide Order dated 21.03.2023.
Ashok Tiwari (Appellant) filed an appeal against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, which dismissed his application C.P. (IB)/642(MB)/2022. The NCLT's order was based on the default occurring during the period excluded under Section 10A of the IBC, 2016. The Appellant had disbursed a loan of Rs.1,50,00,000/- to M/s. Tattva Properties LLP (Principal Borrower) for a project in Mumbai, under a Loan Agreement dated 12.10.2020. Tattva & Mittal Lifespaces Private Limited (Respondent) acted as the Corporate Guarantor. The Principal Borrower failed to repay the loan between 15.02.2021 and 15.03.2021, and also failed to provide the agreed-upon security. The Appellant deposited security cheques issued by both the Principal Borrower and the
…Loan Agreement between Ashok Tiwari and…
Period during which the…