The case involves an appeal against an order dated 10.12.2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) New Delhi Bench - III. The Adjudicating Authority had allowed an application filed by the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) for exclusion of time. The Appellant, the Ex-Director of A to Z Barter Pvt. Ltd., argues that the Adjudicating Authority overlooked essential facts and wrongly allowed the application. The appellant contends that the Respondent Company/Operational Creditor had full knowledge of the impugned order dated 05.12.2018 for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of the 3rd Respondent Company. The appellant also argues that the IRP did not start the CIRP process and his status was not changed

The case involves an appeal against an order dated 10.12.2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) New Delhi Bench - III. The Adjudicating Authority had allowed an application filed by the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) for exclusion of time. The Appellant, the Ex-Director of A to Z Barter Pvt. Ltd., argues that the Adjudicating Authority overlooked essential facts and wrongly allowed the application. The appellant contends that the Respondent Company/Operational Creditor had full knowledge of the impugned order dated 05.12.2018 for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of the 3rd Respondent Company. The appellant also argues that the IRP did not start the CIRP process and his status was not changed