The case involves an appeal against orders passed by the NCLT, Mumbai Bench, concerning a petition alleging oppression and mismanagement in M/s. Aries Agro Vet Associates Pvt. Ltd. The original petition was filed before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, in 2009 and later transferred to the NCLT. The NCLT rejected a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition and a subsequent review application.
Mr. D.H. Narayanasa filed a petition alleging 'oppression and mismanagement' against M/s. Aries Agro Vet Associates Pvt. Ltd. before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, which was later transferred to the NCLT, Mumbai Bench. The petition was initially filed in 2009. The appellant/respondent filed an Interlocutory Application challenging the maintainability of the petition, arguing it was barred by limitation and suffered from non-joinder of necessary parties. The NCLT rejected this application on June 14, 2017, and a subsequent review application on September 15, 2017. The appellants then appealed to the NCLAT. The key facts are the initial filing date of the petition, the grounds for challenging its maintainability, and the NCLT's decisions on the preliminary objection and
…Sign in to view the parties.
Mr. D.H. Narayanasa filed a petition before…
The NCLT, Mumbai Bench, rejected the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal against orders passed by the NCLT, Mumbai Bench, concerning a petition alleging oppression and mismanagement in M/s. Aries Agro Vet Associates Pvt. Ltd. The original petition was filed before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, in 2009 and later transferred to the NCLT. The NCLT rejected a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition and a subsequent review application.
Mr. D.H. Narayanasa filed a petition alleging 'oppression and mismanagement' against M/s. Aries Agro Vet Associates Pvt. Ltd. before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, which was later transferred to the NCLT, Mumbai Bench. The petition was initially filed in 2009. The appellant/respondent filed an Interlocutory Application challenging the maintainability of the petition, arguing it was barred by limitation and suffered from non-joinder of necessary parties. The NCLT rejected this application on June 14, 2017, and a subsequent review application on September 15, 2017. The appellants then appealed to the NCLAT. The key facts are the initial filing date of the petition, the grounds for challenging its maintainability, and the NCLT's decisions on the preliminary objection and
…Mr. D.H. Narayanasa filed a petition before…
The NCLT, Mumbai Bench, rejected the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.