The case involves an appeal against an order dated 31.01.2023 passed in I.A. (IB) No. 300(KB)/2023 and I.A. (IB) No. 1200(KB)/2023 in C.P. (IB)482(KB)/2019 by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench. The appellant sought condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
An appeal was filed against the order dated 31.01.2023 passed in I.A. (IB) No. 300(KB)/2023 and I.A. (IB) No. 1200(KB)/2023.
The registry raised objections to filing a single appeal against two orders in different I.A's.
The appellant filed a fresh appeal, CA (AT) (Ins.) No. 911 of 2024, after withdrawing the earlier appeal CA (AT) (Ins.) No. 829 of 2024.
The respondent objected to the delay condonation application.
The appellant argued that the initial appeal was filed within the limitation period.
The Tribunal treated the appeal as filed within the limitation period.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed in I.A. (IB) No. 300(KB)/2023…
Earlier appeal CA (AT)…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal against an order dated 31.01.2023 passed in I.A. (IB) No. 300(KB)/2023 and I.A. (IB) No. 1200(KB)/2023 in C.P. (IB)482(KB)/2019 by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench. The appellant sought condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
An appeal was filed against the order dated 31.01.2023 passed in I.A. (IB) No. 300(KB)/2023 and I.A. (IB) No. 1200(KB)/2023.
The registry raised objections to filing a single appeal against two orders in different I.A's.
The appellant filed a fresh appeal, CA (AT) (Ins.) No. 911 of 2024, after withdrawing the earlier appeal CA (AT) (Ins.) No. 829 of 2024.
The respondent objected to the delay condonation application.
The appellant argued that the initial appeal was filed within the limitation period.
The Tribunal treated the appeal as filed within the limitation period.
Order passed in I.A. (IB) No. 300(KB)/2023…
Earlier appeal CA (AT)…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.