The case involves an appeal against an order where the appellant's claim was rejected during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Rishi Ganga Power Corporation Ltd. The appellant, Anju Industries, filed its claim with the Resolution Professional on 26.10.2018. However, a Resolution Plan had already been approved by a Successful Resolution Applicant and was pending consideration before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench. The Adjudicating Authority directed that the appellant's application be treated as a representation to be decided by the Monitoring Agency. The Monitoring Agency did not respond in time, leading the appellant to file an application claiming contempt. The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the
…Anju Industries, the appellant, filed a claim during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Rishi Ganga Power Corporation Ltd. The claim was submitted to the Resolution Professional on 2018-10-26. At that time, a Resolution Plan had already been approved and was pending consideration before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench. The Adjudicating Authority directed that the claim be treated as a representation to be decided by the Monitoring Agency. The Monitoring Agency did not respond within a reasonable time. Subsequently, the Supervising Agency communicated on 2019-05-09 that the Resolution Plan earmarked an amount for local area Operational Creditors, but the Appellant did not fall into that category, leading to
…Sign in to view the parties.
Appellant filed claim…
Supervising Agency…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal against an order where the appellant's claim was rejected during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Rishi Ganga Power Corporation Ltd. The appellant, Anju Industries, filed its claim with the Resolution Professional on 26.10.2018. However, a Resolution Plan had already been approved by a Successful Resolution Applicant and was pending consideration before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench. The Adjudicating Authority directed that the appellant's application be treated as a representation to be decided by the Monitoring Agency. The Monitoring Agency did not respond in time, leading the appellant to file an application claiming contempt. The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the
…Anju Industries, the appellant, filed a claim during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Rishi Ganga Power Corporation Ltd. The claim was submitted to the Resolution Professional on 2018-10-26. At that time, a Resolution Plan had already been approved and was pending consideration before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench. The Adjudicating Authority directed that the claim be treated as a representation to be decided by the Monitoring Agency. The Monitoring Agency did not respond within a reasonable time. Subsequently, the Supervising Agency communicated on 2019-05-09 that the Resolution Plan earmarked an amount for local area Operational Creditors, but the Appellant did not fall into that category, leading to
…Appellant filed claim…
Supervising Agency…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.