Mr. Anirudha Balkrishna Joshi, the Appellant, is a guarantor and Director of the 'Corporate Debtor'. He sought an extension of the moratorium to himself as a personal guarantor. The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Mumbai Bench) dismissed his application, stating that the moratorium does not extend to the assets of promoters/co-borrowers/guarantors. The Appellant argued that this finding was erroneous, citing a previous decision of the Appellate Tribunal. The Adjudicating Authority had passed an order on 21.02.2018 in MA No. 402/2017 in C.P. No. 1313/I&BP/2017. The Appellant's application was dismissed based on the premise that the moratorium's protection is limited and doesn't cover the assets of guarantors. The Appellate Tribunal considered a previous case, 'SBI Vs.

Mr. Anirudha Balkrishna Joshi, the Appellant, is a guarantor and Director of the 'Corporate Debtor'. He sought an extension of the moratorium to himself as a personal guarantor. The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Mumbai Bench) dismissed his application, stating that the moratorium does not extend to the assets of promoters/co-borrowers/guarantors. The Appellant argued that this finding was erroneous, citing a previous decision of the Appellate Tribunal. The Adjudicating Authority had passed an order on 21.02.2018 in MA No. 402/2017 in C.P. No. 1313/I&BP/2017. The Appellant's application was dismissed based on the premise that the moratorium's protection is limited and doesn't cover the assets of guarantors. The Appellate Tribunal considered a previous case, 'SBI Vs.