The matter pertains to I.A. No.3143 of 2022 filed by the Respondent for the constitution of COC. The Tribunal passed orders on 2nd May, 2025 and 19th May, 2025 regarding filing of written submissions.
The Respondent filed I.A. No.3143 of 2022 for the constitution of COC.
The Tribunal directed parties to file written submissions on multiple occasions.
The Appellant filed I.A. 2398 of 2025 seeking to file a reply on behalf of certain Respondents.
The Tribunal rejected I.A. 2398 of 2025.
The Appellant argued that they were wrongly recorded as having representation on behalf of Respondents No.7, 10 and 11.
The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's decision in 'State of Maharashtra vs Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak & Anr' regarding the correctness of court records.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed…
Order passed…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The matter pertains to I.A. No.3143 of 2022 filed by the Respondent for the constitution of COC. The Tribunal passed orders on 2nd May, 2025 and 19th May, 2025 regarding filing of written submissions.
The Respondent filed I.A. No.3143 of 2022 for the constitution of COC.
The Tribunal directed parties to file written submissions on multiple occasions.
The Appellant filed I.A. 2398 of 2025 seeking to file a reply on behalf of certain Respondents.
The Tribunal rejected I.A. 2398 of 2025.
The Appellant argued that they were wrongly recorded as having representation on behalf of Respondents No.7, 10 and 11.
The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's decision in 'State of Maharashtra vs Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak & Anr' regarding the correctness of court records.
Order passed…
Order passed…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.