The case involves an appeal related to insolvency proceedings. The Operational Creditor, HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., had initiated an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. However, a settlement was reached between the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor. The Operational Creditor then withdrew the application, leading to the appeal becoming infructuous.
HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., the Operational Creditor, initiated insolvency proceedings against a Corporate Debtor under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Before the matter could be fully adjudicated, the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor reached a settlement. Consequently, HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd. withdrew its application under Section 9. The Adjudicating Authority formally withdrew the application on June 17, 2020. Anil Agarwal, the Director, filed an appeal, but the counsel for the appellant corroborated the settlement and stated that the appellant did not wish to press the appeal further. The resolution costs and expenses of the Interim Resolution Professional were also settled.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating…
NCLAT heard the appeal and disposed of it as…
The case involves an appeal related to insolvency proceedings. The Operational Creditor, HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., had initiated an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. However, a settlement was reached between the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor. The Operational Creditor then withdrew the application, leading to the appeal becoming infructuous.
HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., the Operational Creditor, initiated insolvency proceedings against a Corporate Debtor under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Before the matter could be fully adjudicated, the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor reached a settlement. Consequently, HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd. withdrew its application under Section 9. The Adjudicating Authority formally withdrew the application on June 17, 2020. Anil Agarwal, the Director, filed an appeal, but the counsel for the appellant corroborated the settlement and stated that the appellant did not wish to press the appeal further. The resolution costs and expenses of the Interim Resolution Professional were also settled.
The Adjudicating…
NCLAT heard the appeal and disposed of it as…