The case involves an appeal against an order passed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in Case No. 73/2014. The appellant, Amit Mittal, filed an information application under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that certain clauses of an agreement between him and DLF New Gurgaon Home Developersl Pvt Ltd were violative of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act, which prohibits abuse of dominant position. The CCI initially directed the Director General (DG) to conduct an investigation, and the DG submitted a report indicating a violation of Section 4. However, the CCI subsequently directed further investigation, and the final order concluded that no contravention of Section 4 was established, leading to the closure of the case. The appellant
…Amit Mittal, the appellant, filed an information with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) alleging that DLF Ltd and DLF New Gurgaon Home Developersl Pvt Ltd (respondents) abused their dominant position by imposing unfair clauses in an agreement for the allotment of an apartment in 'Regal Garden', a residential township in Gurgaon. Mittal had applied for an apartment and paid 10% of the sale price as booking amount. He claimed that the agreement contained clauses reflecting abuse of dominance, which were unfair and discriminatory. The CCI initially directed the Director General (DG) to investigate the matter, and the DG submitted a report indicating a violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act. However, the CCI subsequently directed further investigation, and
…Sign in to view the parties.
Appellant was allotted…
Apartment b…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal against an order passed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in Case No. 73/2014. The appellant, Amit Mittal, filed an information application under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that certain clauses of an agreement between him and DLF New Gurgaon Home Developersl Pvt Ltd were violative of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act, which prohibits abuse of dominant position. The CCI initially directed the Director General (DG) to conduct an investigation, and the DG submitted a report indicating a violation of Section 4. However, the CCI subsequently directed further investigation, and the final order concluded that no contravention of Section 4 was established, leading to the closure of the case. The appellant
…Amit Mittal, the appellant, filed an information with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) alleging that DLF Ltd and DLF New Gurgaon Home Developersl Pvt Ltd (respondents) abused their dominant position by imposing unfair clauses in an agreement for the allotment of an apartment in 'Regal Garden', a residential township in Gurgaon. Mittal had applied for an apartment and paid 10% of the sale price as booking amount. He claimed that the agreement contained clauses reflecting abuse of dominance, which were unfair and discriminatory. The CCI initially directed the Director General (DG) to investigate the matter, and the DG submitted a report indicating a violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act. However, the CCI subsequently directed further investigation, and
…Appellant was allotted…
Apartment b…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.