The case involves an appeal against an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chandigarh Bench, regarding an application filed by the Respondent in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) matter. The Respondent, Excise & Taxation Commissioner, filed a claim against the Corporate Debtor, M/s Karan Processors Pvt. Ltd., which was undergoing liquidation. The NCLT directed the Appellant, the liquidator, to treat the Respondent's claim under Section 53(1)(b)(ii) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) at par with the debt owed to a Secured Creditor. The liquidator rejected the claim as it was filed after the prescribed timeline. The NCLT relied on the Supreme Court's decision in State Tax Officer Vs. Rainbow Papers Limited, which held
…M/s Ultratreat Industrial Services initiated CIRP against M/s Karan Processors Pvt. Ltd. ('Corporate Debtor') under Section 9 of the IBC. Amar Nath was appointed as the liquidator after liquidation was ordered. The Excise & Taxation Commissioner (Respondent) filed a claim in Form C after the deadline of 26.12.2020, on 01.03.2021. The Respondent's claim was based on tax dues assessed for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2016-17, amounting to Rs. 18,21,513/-. The liquidator had sent an email to all stakeholders, including the Respondent, on 02.12.2020, and a final reminder on 11.12.2020, regarding the claim submission deadline. The NCLT directed the liquidator to treat the Respondent's claim as a secured debt, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Rainbow Papers
…Sign in to view the parties.
Respondent filed…
Liquidator sent an email to all stakeholders…
The case involves an appeal against an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chandigarh Bench, regarding an application filed by the Respondent in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) matter. The Respondent, Excise & Taxation Commissioner, filed a claim against the Corporate Debtor, M/s Karan Processors Pvt. Ltd., which was undergoing liquidation. The NCLT directed the Appellant, the liquidator, to treat the Respondent's claim under Section 53(1)(b)(ii) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) at par with the debt owed to a Secured Creditor. The liquidator rejected the claim as it was filed after the prescribed timeline. The NCLT relied on the Supreme Court's decision in State Tax Officer Vs. Rainbow Papers Limited, which held
…M/s Ultratreat Industrial Services initiated CIRP against M/s Karan Processors Pvt. Ltd. ('Corporate Debtor') under Section 9 of the IBC. Amar Nath was appointed as the liquidator after liquidation was ordered. The Excise & Taxation Commissioner (Respondent) filed a claim in Form C after the deadline of 26.12.2020, on 01.03.2021. The Respondent's claim was based on tax dues assessed for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2016-17, amounting to Rs. 18,21,513/-. The liquidator had sent an email to all stakeholders, including the Respondent, on 02.12.2020, and a final reminder on 11.12.2020, regarding the claim submission deadline. The NCLT directed the liquidator to treat the Respondent's claim as a secured debt, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Rainbow Papers
…Respondent filed…
Liquidator sent an email to all stakeholders…