The appeal was filed against an impugned order dated 09.05.2024, which admitted a Section 7 application filed by Canara Bank. The appellant had shown a letter dated 08.05.2024 entertaining an OTS offer, requiring a deposit of Rs.45 crores in a no-lien account. The bank communicated this on 13.5.2024, and the appellant deposited Rs.45 crores. The appellant assured the Tribunal on 15.5.2024 of compliance with the OTS sanctioned by the Bank, leading to a stay of the impugned order dated 09.05.2024.
AJR Infra & Tolling Ltd. filed an appeal against an order dated 09.05.2024 admitting a Section 7 application by Canara Bank. The appellant had presented a letter dated 08.05.2024 indicating an OTS offer, requiring a deposit of Rs.45 crores. The bank communicated this on 13.05.2024, and the appellant deposited Rs.45 crores. On 15.05.2024, the appellant assured the Tribunal of compliance with the OTS, leading to a stay of the impugned order. The appellant's counsel submitted that the entire payment had been made in lieu of the OTS. This submission was crucial to the court's decision to dispose of the appeal.
Sign in to view the parties.
Appellant showed a…
Order admitting Section…
The appeal was filed against an impugned order dated 09.05.2024, which admitted a Section 7 application filed by Canara Bank. The appellant had shown a letter dated 08.05.2024 entertaining an OTS offer, requiring a deposit of Rs.45 crores in a no-lien account. The bank communicated this on 13.5.2024, and the appellant deposited Rs.45 crores. The appellant assured the Tribunal on 15.5.2024 of compliance with the OTS sanctioned by the Bank, leading to a stay of the impugned order dated 09.05.2024.
AJR Infra & Tolling Ltd. filed an appeal against an order dated 09.05.2024 admitting a Section 7 application by Canara Bank. The appellant had presented a letter dated 08.05.2024 indicating an OTS offer, requiring a deposit of Rs.45 crores. The bank communicated this on 13.05.2024, and the appellant deposited Rs.45 crores. On 15.05.2024, the appellant assured the Tribunal of compliance with the OTS, leading to a stay of the impugned order. The appellant's counsel submitted that the entire payment had been made in lieu of the OTS. This submission was crucial to the court's decision to dispose of the appeal.
Appellant showed a…
Order admitting Section…