The case involves an appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant disputes the findings of the Adjudicating Authority regarding the threshold limit of 10%. The respondent argues that the Adjudicating Authority's observation that the total unit in the project crossed 338 limits and the Financial Creditors have crossed the threshold limit of 10% is correct.
Ajay Singal filed an appeal against Gaurav Katiyar, the Interim Resolution Professional of GRJ Distributers and Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. The appellant is disputing the findings of the Adjudicating Authority at paragraph 7 of the Impugned Order, specifically regarding the threshold limit of 10%. The appellant claims the case was incorrectly crossed over because it is less than the threshold limit. The respondent argues that the Adjudicating Authority's observation that the total unit in the project cross 338 limits and the Financial Creditors have crossed the threshold limit of 10% is correct. The CoC is not constituted and a SARFAESI charge is pending on the subject property.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority passed an order in…
The Tribunal heard the arguments of the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant disputes the findings of the Adjudicating Authority regarding the threshold limit of 10%. The respondent argues that the Adjudicating Authority's observation that the total unit in the project crossed 338 limits and the Financial Creditors have crossed the threshold limit of 10% is correct.
Ajay Singal filed an appeal against Gaurav Katiyar, the Interim Resolution Professional of GRJ Distributers and Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. The appellant is disputing the findings of the Adjudicating Authority at paragraph 7 of the Impugned Order, specifically regarding the threshold limit of 10%. The appellant claims the case was incorrectly crossed over because it is less than the threshold limit. The respondent argues that the Adjudicating Authority's observation that the total unit in the project cross 338 limits and the Financial Creditors have crossed the threshold limit of 10% is correct. The CoC is not constituted and a SARFAESI charge is pending on the subject property.
The Adjudicating Authority passed an order in…
The Tribunal heard the arguments of the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.