The case involves an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning Aircel Employee Representatives (AER) as the Appellant and Dishnet Wireless Ltd. as the Respondent. The Appellant's counsel argued that similarly situated Operational Creditors (Employees) should not be discriminated against by the Resolution Professional. Reliance was placed on a prior decision of the Appellate Tribunal in 'Binani Industries Limited Vs Bank of Baroda & Anr.'
Aircel Employee Representatives (AER) filed an appeal against Dishnet Wireless Ltd. The Appellant's counsel argued that Operational Creditors (Employees) were being discriminated against by the Resolution Professional. The Appellant relied on a previous decision of the Appellate Tribunal in 'Binani Industries Limited Vs Bank of Baroda & Anr.' Ms. Misha, Advocate for RP, accepted the notice on behalf of the Respondent. The Respondent was given 10 days to file a reply affidavit, and the Appellant was given a week to file a rejoinder. The case was scheduled for admission on December 18, 2018. The court stated that the appeal should not impede the resolution process.
Sign in to view the parties.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the…
Case poste…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning Aircel Employee Representatives (AER) as the Appellant and Dishnet Wireless Ltd. as the Respondent. The Appellant's counsel argued that similarly situated Operational Creditors (Employees) should not be discriminated against by the Resolution Professional. Reliance was placed on a prior decision of the Appellate Tribunal in 'Binani Industries Limited Vs Bank of Baroda & Anr.'
Aircel Employee Representatives (AER) filed an appeal against Dishnet Wireless Ltd. The Appellant's counsel argued that Operational Creditors (Employees) were being discriminated against by the Resolution Professional. The Appellant relied on a previous decision of the Appellate Tribunal in 'Binani Industries Limited Vs Bank of Baroda & Anr.' Ms. Misha, Advocate for RP, accepted the notice on behalf of the Respondent. The Respondent was given 10 days to file a reply affidavit, and the Appellant was given a week to file a rejoinder. The case was scheduled for admission on December 18, 2018. The court stated that the appeal should not impede the resolution process.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the…
Case poste…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.