The case involves an application filed for an amount of Rs.36,11,237/-. The Corporate Debtor was under CIRP from 2021-2023. An amount of Rs.32,41,276/- was also offered to the Corporate Debtor but was not accepted. The Counsel for the Respondents refuted this statement.
The Appellant filed an application for Rs.36,11,237/- against a Corporate Debtor that was under CIRP from 2021 to 2023. The Appellant offered Rs.32,41,276/- to the Corporate Debtor, which was not accepted. The Appellant is now ready to deposit Rs.36,11,237/- and pay reasonable interest after negotiation. The court directed the Appellant to deposit the amount and allowed the Respondents to file a reply. The relevance of the facts lies in determining the financial obligations and the status of the CIRP process.
Sign in to view the parties.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that…
The Appeal is listed…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an application filed for an amount of Rs.36,11,237/-. The Corporate Debtor was under CIRP from 2021-2023. An amount of Rs.32,41,276/- was also offered to the Corporate Debtor but was not accepted. The Counsel for the Respondents refuted this statement.
The Appellant filed an application for Rs.36,11,237/- against a Corporate Debtor that was under CIRP from 2021 to 2023. The Appellant offered Rs.32,41,276/- to the Corporate Debtor, which was not accepted. The Appellant is now ready to deposit Rs.36,11,237/- and pay reasonable interest after negotiation. The court directed the Appellant to deposit the amount and allowed the Respondents to file a reply. The relevance of the facts lies in determining the financial obligations and the status of the CIRP process.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that…
The Appeal is listed…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.