This appeal was filed against the order dated 05/02/2026, by which I.A. No. 3713/2024, filed by the Respondent Bank has been allowed, permitting the Appellant to amend the date of default and date declaration of the NPA.
The Respondent Bank filed I.A. No. 3713/2024, which was allowed by the Adjudicating Authority.
The Appellant was permitted to amend the date of default and date declaration of the NPA.
The Appellant argued that relevant RBI inspection reports were not brought on record without permission.
The Adjudicating Authority referred to the Supreme Court judgement in Dena Bank vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy, which permits amendment of applications by the Financial Creditor under Section 7.
The Respondent was given time to object to the date of default and declaration of NPA and file a reply.
The court found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's order allowing the financial creditor to amend the dates.
Sign in to view the parties.
Heard Ld. Counsel for…
Order passed by which I.A. No. 3713/2024, filed…
This appeal was filed against the order dated 05/02/2026, by which I.A. No. 3713/2024, filed by the Respondent Bank has been allowed, permitting the Appellant to amend the date of default and date declaration of the NPA.
The Respondent Bank filed I.A. No. 3713/2024, which was allowed by the Adjudicating Authority.
The Appellant was permitted to amend the date of default and date declaration of the NPA.
The Appellant argued that relevant RBI inspection reports were not brought on record without permission.
The Adjudicating Authority referred to the Supreme Court judgement in Dena Bank vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy, which permits amendment of applications by the Financial Creditor under Section 7.
The Respondent was given time to object to the date of default and declaration of NPA and file a reply.
The court found no error in the Adjudicating Authority's order allowing the financial creditor to amend the dates.
Heard Ld. Counsel for…
Order passed by which I.A. No. 3713/2024, filed…