The Appellant, an Operational Creditor, was awarded a work contract by the Corporate Debtor, V A Tech Wabag Ltd. for civil works related to a Plant Water system. The work order was amended, and a Completion Certificate was issued. However, the Corporate Debtor allegedly restricted the Appellant's access to the site and failed to pay outstanding dues despite correspondences and meetings.
Shrushti Contech Private Limited (Appellant) was awarded a work contract by V A Tech Wabag Limited (Respondent/Corporate Debtor).
The work contract was for civil works for a Plant Water system.
A Completion Certificate was issued on 23.04.2015.
The Appellant claims the Corporate Debtor restricted access to the site and failed to pay outstanding dues.
The Appellant filed a Section 9 application under the I&B Code, which was dismissed by the NCLT.
The NCLT dismissed the application due to limitation and the existence of a pre-existing dispute.
The Appellant contends that the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt in various correspondences and auditor's reports.
…Sign in to view the parties.
Work order No.…
The work order was…
The Appellant, an Operational Creditor, was awarded a work contract by the Corporate Debtor, V A Tech Wabag Ltd. for civil works related to a Plant Water system. The work order was amended, and a Completion Certificate was issued. However, the Corporate Debtor allegedly restricted the Appellant's access to the site and failed to pay outstanding dues despite correspondences and meetings.
Shrushti Contech Private Limited (Appellant) was awarded a work contract by V A Tech Wabag Limited (Respondent/Corporate Debtor).
The work contract was for civil works for a Plant Water system.
A Completion Certificate was issued on 23.04.2015.
The Appellant claims the Corporate Debtor restricted access to the site and failed to pay outstanding dues.
The Appellant filed a Section 9 application under the I&B Code, which was dismissed by the NCLT.
The NCLT dismissed the application due to limitation and the existence of a pre-existing dispute.
The Appellant contends that the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt in various correspondences and auditor's reports.
…Work order No.…
The work order was…