The writ petition was filed as a public interest litigation by a law student concerning the application of certain provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), specifically Sections 12 and 14. The petitioner contended that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC should only apply to monetary claims against the corporate debtor and not to non-monetary obligations or decrees for specific performance. The petitioner also raised concerns about delays in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the Adjudicatory Authority not strictly adhering to the timelines stipulated under Section 12 of the IBC.
The petitioner, a law student, filed a writ petition in the nature of public interest litigation, raising concerns about the application of certain provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The petitioner specifically challenged the scope of the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, arguing that it should only apply to monetary claims against the corporate debtor and not to non-monetary obligations or decrees for specific performance. The petitioner also raised concerns about delays in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the Adjudicatory Authority not strictly adhering to the timelines stipulated under Section 12 of the IBC. The petitioner contended that the moratorium should not affect proceedings where the corporate debtor
…Sign in to view the parties.
The case was r…
The case was d…
The writ petition was filed as a public interest litigation by a law student concerning the application of certain provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), specifically Sections 12 and 14. The petitioner contended that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC should only apply to monetary claims against the corporate debtor and not to non-monetary obligations or decrees for specific performance. The petitioner also raised concerns about delays in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the Adjudicatory Authority not strictly adhering to the timelines stipulated under Section 12 of the IBC.
The petitioner, a law student, filed a writ petition in the nature of public interest litigation, raising concerns about the application of certain provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The petitioner specifically challenged the scope of the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, arguing that it should only apply to monetary claims against the corporate debtor and not to non-monetary obligations or decrees for specific performance. The petitioner also raised concerns about delays in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the Adjudicatory Authority not strictly adhering to the timelines stipulated under Section 12 of the IBC. The petitioner contended that the moratorium should not affect proceedings where the corporate debtor
…The case was r…
The case was d…