The case involves two appeals, MFA No.3185/2017 and MFA No.3186/2017, filed against orders of the ESI Court. MFA No.3185/2017 challenges the ESI Court's order that partly allowed ESI Application No.27/2014, setting aside an order dated 13.6.2014 under Section 85-B of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, which claimed Rs.26,34,569/- in contributions but directed the applicant to pay only Rs.6 lakhs. MFA No.3186/2017 challenges the ESI Court's order that partly allowed ESI Application No.28/2014, setting aside an order under Section 45-A of the ESI Act claiming Rs.13,04,074/- in interest for the period 01/2009 to 06/2013 but directed payment of only Rs.3 lakhs to the ESI Corporation. Both appeals concern delayed ESI contributions by the respondent, Renram Fashions
…The respondent, M/S Renram Fashions India Pvt. Ltd., made delayed payments of ESI contributions for the period between January 2009 and June 2013, totaling Rs. 40,30,086. Due to the delay, the ESI Corporation issued notices claiming Rs. 13,04,074 as interest and Rs. 26,34,569 as damages. The respondent then filed ESI applications before the ESI Court, which partly allowed the applications, reducing the interest to Rs. 3,00,000 and the damages to Rs. 6,00,000. The ESI Corporation appealed these reductions, arguing that the ESI Court erred in reducing the amounts. The respondent argued that the delay was due to a lack of awareness of the quantification of the contribution and poor health. The ESI Court had considered the applicant's lack of awareness of the
…Sign in to view the parties.
The period for which…
The period for which…
The case involves two appeals, MFA No.3185/2017 and MFA No.3186/2017, filed against orders of the ESI Court. MFA No.3185/2017 challenges the ESI Court's order that partly allowed ESI Application No.27/2014, setting aside an order dated 13.6.2014 under Section 85-B of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, which claimed Rs.26,34,569/- in contributions but directed the applicant to pay only Rs.6 lakhs. MFA No.3186/2017 challenges the ESI Court's order that partly allowed ESI Application No.28/2014, setting aside an order under Section 45-A of the ESI Act claiming Rs.13,04,074/- in interest for the period 01/2009 to 06/2013 but directed payment of only Rs.3 lakhs to the ESI Corporation. Both appeals concern delayed ESI contributions by the respondent, Renram Fashions
…The respondent, M/S Renram Fashions India Pvt. Ltd., made delayed payments of ESI contributions for the period between January 2009 and June 2013, totaling Rs. 40,30,086. Due to the delay, the ESI Corporation issued notices claiming Rs. 13,04,074 as interest and Rs. 26,34,569 as damages. The respondent then filed ESI applications before the ESI Court, which partly allowed the applications, reducing the interest to Rs. 3,00,000 and the damages to Rs. 6,00,000. The ESI Corporation appealed these reductions, arguing that the ESI Court erred in reducing the amounts. The respondent argued that the delay was due to a lack of awareness of the quantification of the contribution and poor health. The ESI Court had considered the applicant's lack of awareness of the
…The period for which…
The period for which…