Sandeep Jajodia filed a petition in the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The petitioner's counsel argued that proceedings against the corporate person were initiated in Mumbai. A notification dated 12th July 2018 allowed proceedings against corporate persons of Chhattisgarh to be filed in Cuttack, but it did not address the transfer of pending proceedings from Mumbai. The petitioner seeks interim protection. IDBI Bank and another are the opposite parties. The Union of India was added as a party. The court directed the opposite parties to file counters by March 28, 2022, and the petitioner to file a rejoinder by April 4, 2022. The Union of India is expected to state its position regarding the interpretation of the July 12, 2018 notification.

Sandeep Jajodia filed a petition in the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The petitioner's counsel argued that proceedings against the corporate person were initiated in Mumbai. A notification dated 12th July 2018 allowed proceedings against corporate persons of Chhattisgarh to be filed in Cuttack, but it did not address the transfer of pending proceedings from Mumbai. The petitioner seeks interim protection. IDBI Bank and another are the opposite parties. The Union of India was added as a party. The court directed the opposite parties to file counters by March 28, 2022, and the petitioner to file a rejoinder by April 4, 2022. The Union of India is expected to state its position regarding the interpretation of the July 12, 2018 notification.