Power Infrastructure India filed a petition seeking to quash an order by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) requiring physical filing of documents for the computation of limitation. The NCLAT order was issued due to a disagreement between two members of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), leading to a third member pronouncing the order. An appeal was filed before the NCLAT challenging the NCLT order. The petitioner contends that the e-filing of the appeal was done within the prescribed limitation period, but the physical filing was done later, raising concerns about potential dismissal of the appeal.
Power Infrastructure India filed an appeal before the NCLAT challenging an order of the NCLT. The NCLT order was issued following a disagreement between two members, with a third member ultimately pronouncing the order. The petitioner e-filed the appeal within the 45-day limitation period, with the deadline falling on a Saturday. However, the physical filing was completed on the following Monday. The NCLAT issued an order stating that the date of physical filing would be considered the date of filing for limitation purposes. The petitioner fears that the appeal may be dismissed due to the delay in physical filing, despite the timely e-filing. The relevant facts are the dates of the NCLT order, the e-filing, the physical filing, and the NCLAT order regarding physical
…Sign in to view the parties.
NCLAT issued order No. F.No.10/37/2018-NCLAT…
The Petitioner e-filed…
Power Infrastructure India filed a petition seeking to quash an order by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) requiring physical filing of documents for the computation of limitation. The NCLAT order was issued due to a disagreement between two members of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), leading to a third member pronouncing the order. An appeal was filed before the NCLAT challenging the NCLT order. The petitioner contends that the e-filing of the appeal was done within the prescribed limitation period, but the physical filing was done later, raising concerns about potential dismissal of the appeal.
Power Infrastructure India filed an appeal before the NCLAT challenging an order of the NCLT. The NCLT order was issued following a disagreement between two members, with a third member ultimately pronouncing the order. The petitioner e-filed the appeal within the 45-day limitation period, with the deadline falling on a Saturday. However, the physical filing was completed on the following Monday. The NCLAT issued an order stating that the date of physical filing would be considered the date of filing for limitation purposes. The petitioner fears that the appeal may be dismissed due to the delay in physical filing, despite the timely e-filing. The relevant facts are the dates of the NCLT order, the e-filing, the physical filing, and the NCLAT order regarding physical
…NCLAT issued order No. F.No.10/37/2018-NCLAT…
The Petitioner e-filed…