The writ petition challenges the order dated 26.08.2021 passed by respondent No.3 canceling the terminating lease, the order dated 04.02.2022 passed by the Industries Commissioner as per Rule 44 of MP MSME Industrial Land, Building Allotment and Management Rules, 2001, and the order dated 11.07.2022 passed by the Second Appellate Authority under the aforesaid rules i.e. the Secretary of the said Department.
Mangesh Vitthal Kekre, the Resolution Professional of M/S Indian Soya Industries Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging three orders: (1) the order dated 26.08.2021 canceling the terminating lease, (2) the order dated 04.02.2022 passed by the Industries Commissioner under the MP MSME Industrial Land, Building Allotment and Management Rules, 2001, and (3) the order dated 11.07.2022 passed by the Second Appellate Authority. The petitioner argued that the same person decided both the first and second appeals, violating the principles of natural justice. The respondents did not dispute that the same person decided both appeals but argued that they were decided in different capacities. The court noted an interim order dated 03.01.2023, directing no coercive
…Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed by…
Order passed by the Industries Commissioner as…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The writ petition challenges the order dated 26.08.2021 passed by respondent No.3 canceling the terminating lease, the order dated 04.02.2022 passed by the Industries Commissioner as per Rule 44 of MP MSME Industrial Land, Building Allotment and Management Rules, 2001, and the order dated 11.07.2022 passed by the Second Appellate Authority under the aforesaid rules i.e. the Secretary of the said Department.
Mangesh Vitthal Kekre, the Resolution Professional of M/S Indian Soya Industries Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging three orders: (1) the order dated 26.08.2021 canceling the terminating lease, (2) the order dated 04.02.2022 passed by the Industries Commissioner under the MP MSME Industrial Land, Building Allotment and Management Rules, 2001, and (3) the order dated 11.07.2022 passed by the Second Appellate Authority. The petitioner argued that the same person decided both the first and second appeals, violating the principles of natural justice. The respondents did not dispute that the same person decided both appeals but argued that they were decided in different capacities. The court noted an interim order dated 03.01.2023, directing no coercive
…Order passed by…
Order passed by the Industries Commissioner as…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.