The case involves O.M.P. (COMM) 259/2023 before the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. Hiranmaye Energy Limited is the petitioner, and Technico (India) Private Limited is the respondent. The court noted that the petitioner was undergoing insolvency proceedings and an IRP had been appointed.
Hiranmaye Energy Limited filed a petition against Technico (India) Private Limited. The court noted on 2024-12-10 that Hiranmaye Energy Limited was undergoing insolvency proceedings since 2024-01-18, and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) had been appointed. Time was sought to file vakalatnama on behalf of the IRP. Neither party could provide the status of the insolvency proceedings, leading to an adjournment. Vakalatnama had not been filed on behalf of the IRP. The court deferred adverse orders and directed the vakalatnama to be filed within two weeks. The matter was listed for 2025-07-25.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Court noted the…
Petitioner was…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves O.M.P. (COMM) 259/2023 before the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. Hiranmaye Energy Limited is the petitioner, and Technico (India) Private Limited is the respondent. The court noted that the petitioner was undergoing insolvency proceedings and an IRP had been appointed.
Hiranmaye Energy Limited filed a petition against Technico (India) Private Limited. The court noted on 2024-12-10 that Hiranmaye Energy Limited was undergoing insolvency proceedings since 2024-01-18, and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) had been appointed. Time was sought to file vakalatnama on behalf of the IRP. Neither party could provide the status of the insolvency proceedings, leading to an adjournment. Vakalatnama had not been filed on behalf of the IRP. The court deferred adverse orders and directed the vakalatnama to be filed within two weeks. The matter was listed for 2025-07-25.
The Court noted the…
Petitioner was…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.