The case involves a dispute over a lease deed executed between M/s Rohtas Projects Limited and M/s Decathlon Sports India Private Ltd. Petitioners, claiming to be transferees of portions of the leased property, initiated arbitration proceedings against Decathlon, seeking rent and damages. The arbitrator dropped the proceedings for lack of jurisdiction, citing a moratorium imposed by the NCLT due to insolvency proceedings against Rohtas Projects Limited and the absence of an arbitration agreement between the petitioners and Decathlon. The petitioners challenged this order, as well as the Commercial Court's order upholding the arbitrator's decision, before the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
M/s Rohtas Projects Limited executed a lease deed on 2017-04-07 in favor of M/s Decathlon Sports India Private Ltd, leasing out an area of 21,825 square feet in Lucknow for 20 years. Subsequently, some individuals, including Hina Juneja, entered into agreements to purchase units within the leased premises from Rohtas Projects Limited. These individuals, the petitioners, claimed to have purchased various units forming part of the leased premises. A dispute arose when the petitioners requested Decathlon to clear outstanding rent payments. Upon Decathlon's failure to do so, the petitioners issued a joint notice terminating Decathlon's tenancy. The petitioners then filed an arbitration application before the court, seeking the appointment of an arbitrator. The proceedings
…Sign in to view the parties.
M/s Rohtas Projects Limited executed a lease…
Petitioner no. 2, Hina…
The case involves a dispute over a lease deed executed between M/s Rohtas Projects Limited and M/s Decathlon Sports India Private Ltd. Petitioners, claiming to be transferees of portions of the leased property, initiated arbitration proceedings against Decathlon, seeking rent and damages. The arbitrator dropped the proceedings for lack of jurisdiction, citing a moratorium imposed by the NCLT due to insolvency proceedings against Rohtas Projects Limited and the absence of an arbitration agreement between the petitioners and Decathlon. The petitioners challenged this order, as well as the Commercial Court's order upholding the arbitrator's decision, before the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
M/s Rohtas Projects Limited executed a lease deed on 2017-04-07 in favor of M/s Decathlon Sports India Private Ltd, leasing out an area of 21,825 square feet in Lucknow for 20 years. Subsequently, some individuals, including Hina Juneja, entered into agreements to purchase units within the leased premises from Rohtas Projects Limited. These individuals, the petitioners, claimed to have purchased various units forming part of the leased premises. A dispute arose when the petitioners requested Decathlon to clear outstanding rent payments. Upon Decathlon's failure to do so, the petitioners issued a joint notice terminating Decathlon's tenancy. The petitioners then filed an arbitration application before the court, seeking the appointment of an arbitrator. The proceedings
…M/s Rohtas Projects Limited executed a lease…
Petitioner no. 2, Hina…