The writ petition challenges the cancellation of the petitioner's registration as a Resolution Professional (RP) by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI). The respondent raised a question of maintainability of the writ petition, arguing that the Calcutta High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction. The petitioner contends that the cancellation affects his ability to function as an RP throughout India, including within the jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court, where he is registered.
Ananda Rao Korada filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of his registration as a Resolution Professional (RP) by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI). The petitioner is registered in Kolkata. The decision to cancel the registration was taken by the respondent in New Delhi. The petitioner argues that the cancellation affects his ability to function as an RP throughout India, including within the jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court. The respondent contends that the Calcutta High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction because the decision to cancel the registration was made in New Delhi. The petitioner received the cancellation order in Kolkata. The petitioner has been acting as a resolution professional in Odisha. The petitioner relies on
…Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed r…
The matter is listed…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The writ petition challenges the cancellation of the petitioner's registration as a Resolution Professional (RP) by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI). The respondent raised a question of maintainability of the writ petition, arguing that the Calcutta High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction. The petitioner contends that the cancellation affects his ability to function as an RP throughout India, including within the jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court, where he is registered.
Ananda Rao Korada filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of his registration as a Resolution Professional (RP) by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI). The petitioner is registered in Kolkata. The decision to cancel the registration was taken by the respondent in New Delhi. The petitioner argues that the cancellation affects his ability to function as an RP throughout India, including within the jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court. The respondent contends that the Calcutta High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction because the decision to cancel the registration was made in New Delhi. The petitioner received the cancellation order in Kolkata. The petitioner has been acting as a resolution professional in Odisha. The petitioner relies on
…Order passed r…
The matter is listed…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.