The petitioner, M/S. AIR TRAVEL ENTERPRISES INDIA LTD., filed a writ petition being aggrieved by Ext.P3 order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Kochi Bench. The petitioner sought relief against the order passed by the NCLT.
M/S. AIR TRAVEL ENTERPRISES INDIA LTD. filed a writ petition against an order (Ext.P3) from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Kochi Bench. The petitioner's counsel argued that the NCLT order was appealable, but no interim relief could be obtained because the NCLT was not in session. The counsel referred to clause No.22(vi) of the Writ Petition, which stipulated a one-week period for the Corporate Debtor to provide documents to the IRP. The court was informed that the period had expired on the day of the hearing. The respondent had filed an application C.P (IBC) NO.33/КΟB/2023, and the order in question was dated 22.12.2023.
Sign in to view the parties.
The respondent…
The petitione…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The petitioner, M/S. AIR TRAVEL ENTERPRISES INDIA LTD., filed a writ petition being aggrieved by Ext.P3 order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Kochi Bench. The petitioner sought relief against the order passed by the NCLT.
M/S. AIR TRAVEL ENTERPRISES INDIA LTD. filed a writ petition against an order (Ext.P3) from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Kochi Bench. The petitioner's counsel argued that the NCLT order was appealable, but no interim relief could be obtained because the NCLT was not in session. The counsel referred to clause No.22(vi) of the Writ Petition, which stipulated a one-week period for the Corporate Debtor to provide documents to the IRP. The court was informed that the period had expired on the day of the hearing. The respondent had filed an application C.P (IBC) NO.33/КΟB/2023, and the order in question was dated 22.12.2023.
The respondent…
The petitione…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.