The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India to approach the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and pursue the remedy under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal.
The petitioner filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition to approach the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioner wanted to challenge an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal. The court granted permission to withdraw the petition, and it was disposed of as withdrawn. The court clarified that it did not consider the merits of the case due to the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Sign in to view the parties.
Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks…
The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India to approach the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and pursue the remedy under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal.
The petitioner filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition to approach the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioner wanted to challenge an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal. The court granted permission to withdraw the petition, and it was disposed of as withdrawn. The court clarified that it did not consider the merits of the case due to the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks…