The case involves a petition filed by GP Capt Atul Jain against the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The petitioner expressed grievances against the NCLT and NCLAT, alleging the adoption of wrong procedures by these tribunals. The petitioner drafted the petition himself, which included slang language deemed inappropriate for court pleadings.
GP Capt Atul Jain filed a petition against the NCLAT, raising concerns about the procedures adopted by the NCLT and NCLAT. The petitioner drafted the petition himself and included slang language, specifically the phrase 'Tom, Dick, and Harry,' in paragraph 6(f) to describe individuals who should not be allowed to represent respondents under Section 7 of the IBC. The court found this language inappropriate for court pleadings. The petitioner then sought to withdraw the petition, which the court allowed, granting him the liberty to avail of his remedies in accordance with the law. No costs were imposed as the petitioner appeared in person.
Sign in to view the parties.
The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn,…
The case involves a petition filed by GP Capt Atul Jain against the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The petitioner expressed grievances against the NCLT and NCLAT, alleging the adoption of wrong procedures by these tribunals. The petitioner drafted the petition himself, which included slang language deemed inappropriate for court pleadings.
GP Capt Atul Jain filed a petition against the NCLAT, raising concerns about the procedures adopted by the NCLT and NCLAT. The petitioner drafted the petition himself and included slang language, specifically the phrase 'Tom, Dick, and Harry,' in paragraph 6(f) to describe individuals who should not be allowed to represent respondents under Section 7 of the IBC. The court found this language inappropriate for court pleadings. The petitioner then sought to withdraw the petition, which the court allowed, granting him the liberty to avail of his remedies in accordance with the law. No costs were imposed as the petitioner appeared in person.
The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn,…