The writ petition challenges an order dated 2017-10-12 issued by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which rejected the petitioner's application for registration as an Insolvency Professional (IP) under Regulation 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professional) Regulations, 2016. The rejection was based on the ground that the petitioner was deemed not a fit and proper person under Regulation 4(g)(i) of the 2016 Regulation.
Dr. Vidya Sagar Garg filed a writ petition challenging the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India's (IBBI) order dated 2017-10-12, which rejected his application for registration as an Insolvency Professional (IP). The rejection was based on the premise that he was not a 'fit and proper person' due to a pending FIR (No. RC/219/2012, dated 2012-07-03) and subsequent chargesheet filed on 2014-02-17. An application for discharge was filed before the concerned Trial Court on 2016-01-13. The petitioner argued he had no role in the alleged infraction. The respondent's counsel acknowledged that the matter's perspective would change if the discharge application was allowed. The court considered the pending discharge application before the Trial Court.
Sign in to view the parties.
FIR No. RC/219/…
A chargesheet was filed…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The writ petition challenges an order dated 2017-10-12 issued by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which rejected the petitioner's application for registration as an Insolvency Professional (IP) under Regulation 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professional) Regulations, 2016. The rejection was based on the ground that the petitioner was deemed not a fit and proper person under Regulation 4(g)(i) of the 2016 Regulation.
Dr. Vidya Sagar Garg filed a writ petition challenging the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India's (IBBI) order dated 2017-10-12, which rejected his application for registration as an Insolvency Professional (IP). The rejection was based on the premise that he was not a 'fit and proper person' due to a pending FIR (No. RC/219/2012, dated 2012-07-03) and subsequent chargesheet filed on 2014-02-17. An application for discharge was filed before the concerned Trial Court on 2016-01-13. The petitioner argued he had no role in the alleged infraction. The respondent's counsel acknowledged that the matter's perspective would change if the discharge application was allowed. The court considered the pending discharge application before the Trial Court.
FIR No. RC/219/…
A chargesheet was filed…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.