This writ petition challenges the vires of Sections 7, 8, and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The petitioners argue that the IBC's distinction between financial and operational creditors lacks a rational basis and unduly favors financial creditors. They contend that the Code does not adequately empower the adjudicating authority to scrutinize claims by financial creditors, while imposing stricter scrutiny on operational creditors. The petitioners also argue that the IBC limits the corporate debtor's ability to challenge claims and seek injunctions against proceedings. The respondents, including the Union of India, oppose the petition, arguing that the IBC introduces necessary reforms to insolvency proceedings, provides for a paradigm shift in the
…Akshay Jhunjhunwala & Anr. filed a writ petition challenging the vires of Sections 7, 8, and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioners argued that the IBC's distinction between financial and operational creditors is discriminatory and lacks a rational basis. They claimed that the IBC unduly favors financial creditors by granting them greater influence in the Committee of Creditors (COC) and imposing less stringent scrutiny on their claims. The petitioners also argued that the IBC restricts the corporate debtor's ability to challenge claims and seek injunctions. The Union of India and other respondents opposed the petition, asserting that the IBC introduces necessary reforms to insolvency proceedings and that the classification of creditors is
…Sign in to view the parties.
The hearing in…
The judgment was…
This writ petition challenges the vires of Sections 7, 8, and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The petitioners argue that the IBC's distinction between financial and operational creditors lacks a rational basis and unduly favors financial creditors. They contend that the Code does not adequately empower the adjudicating authority to scrutinize claims by financial creditors, while imposing stricter scrutiny on operational creditors. The petitioners also argue that the IBC limits the corporate debtor's ability to challenge claims and seek injunctions against proceedings. The respondents, including the Union of India, oppose the petition, arguing that the IBC introduces necessary reforms to insolvency proceedings, provides for a paradigm shift in the
…Akshay Jhunjhunwala & Anr. filed a writ petition challenging the vires of Sections 7, 8, and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioners argued that the IBC's distinction between financial and operational creditors is discriminatory and lacks a rational basis. They claimed that the IBC unduly favors financial creditors by granting them greater influence in the Committee of Creditors (COC) and imposing less stringent scrutiny on their claims. The petitioners also argued that the IBC restricts the corporate debtor's ability to challenge claims and seek injunctions. The Union of India and other respondents opposed the petition, asserting that the IBC introduces necessary reforms to insolvency proceedings and that the classification of creditors is
…The hearing in…
The judgment was…