The defendant, Tirrihannah Co. Ltd., filed an application (G.A. (Com) No. 2 of 2024) seeking amendment of its written statement to incorporate a counter-claim against the plaintiff, Prabhat Marketing Co. Ltd.
The defendant filed an application (G.A. (Com) No. 2 of 2024) to amend its written statement to include a counter-claim.
The defendant claimed that the chemical supplied by the plaintiff was not meant for protection of tea plantation, resulting in loss and damage.
The defendant's loss assessment was based on a Chartered Accountant's report dated February 3, 2020.
The plaintiff argued that the counter-claim was barred by limitation.
The writ of summons was served on the defendant on January 24, 2024.
The defendant filed the written statement on June 12, 2024, after obtaining an extension of time from the court.
The defendant claimed that the plaintiff misrepresented that 'Miteshot' was effective for tea plantation.
…Sign in to view the parties.
Writ of summo…
Court allowed the…
The defendant, Tirrihannah Co. Ltd., filed an application (G.A. (Com) No. 2 of 2024) seeking amendment of its written statement to incorporate a counter-claim against the plaintiff, Prabhat Marketing Co. Ltd.
The defendant filed an application (G.A. (Com) No. 2 of 2024) to amend its written statement to include a counter-claim.
The defendant claimed that the chemical supplied by the plaintiff was not meant for protection of tea plantation, resulting in loss and damage.
The defendant's loss assessment was based on a Chartered Accountant's report dated February 3, 2020.
The plaintiff argued that the counter-claim was barred by limitation.
The writ of summons was served on the defendant on January 24, 2024.
The defendant filed the written statement on June 12, 2024, after obtaining an extension of time from the court.
The defendant claimed that the plaintiff misrepresented that 'Miteshot' was effective for tea plantation.
…Writ of summo…
Court allowed the…