C. Krishnaiah Chetty and Sons Private Limited filed a suit against Deepali Co. Private Limited seeking a perpetual injunction against using certain trademarks.

The trial court dismissed the suit based on an application by the defendants under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC, citing Section 430 of the Companies Act 2013.

The appellant filed a commercial appeal against the trial court's order with a delay of 366 days.

The appellant claimed the delay was due to awaiting the outcome of an application before the NCLAT seeking permission to convene board meetings.

The respondents argued that the appellant had participated in prior litigations without proper board authorization and that the delay was intentional and deliberate.

C. Krishnaiah Chetty and Sons Private Limited filed a suit against Deepali Co. Private Limited seeking a perpetual injunction against using certain trademarks.

The trial court dismissed the suit based on an application by the defendants under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC, citing Section 430 of the Companies Act 2013.

The appellant filed a commercial appeal against the trial court's order with a delay of 366 days.

The appellant claimed the delay was due to awaiting the outcome of an application before the NCLAT seeking permission to convene board meetings.

The respondents argued that the appellant had participated in prior litigations without proper board authorization and that the delay was intentional and deliberate.