# Arul Prasad Senniappan vs. Viprah Technologies Limited

> NCLT judgment dated 10 Oct 2025. Citation: TCN-2025-NCLT-01500. The case involves an application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,…

- **Court:** NCLT
- **Order date:** 10 Oct 2025
- **Citation:** TCN-2025-NCLT-01500
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclt-kolkata/arul-prasad-senniappan-vs-viprah-technologies-limited-419f7ed8

## Summary

### Background

The case involves an application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by Arul Prasad Senniappan, an operational creditor and former Director (Operations) of Viprah Technologies Limited, seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor for unpaid salary dues amounting to Rs. 10.50 lakhs.

## Facts

Arul Prasad Senniappan filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Arul Prasad Senniappan was the Petitioner/Operational Creditor.

Viprah Technologies Limited is the Respondent/Corporate Debtor.

The application pertains to initiating Corporate Insolvency Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor.

Arul Prasad Senniappan was appointed as Director (Operations) of Viprah Technologies Limited.

Arul Prasad Senniappan claims unpaid salary dues of Rs. 10.50 lakhs for the period from 01.01.2016 to 31.03.2017.

The date of default commenced on 01.04.2017.

A demand notice in Form 3 was issued on 16.09.2019.

The Respondent denies any amount is due to the Applicant/Operational Creditor.

The Respondent contends the claim is barred by limitation.

…

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the monetary threshold for …

**Ratio:** Section 4 of the IBC prescribes a

…

**Reasoning:** The petition was filed on 17.10.2019, prior to the notification dated 24.03.2020

…

**Interpretation:** The amended threshold of Rs. 1 crore is prospective and does not apply to

…

**Application:** The monetary threshold for initiation under Section 9 stands duly satisfied as

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** JYOTI KUMAR…; RAVICHANDRAN…
- **Appellants:** Arul Prasad…
- **Respondents:** Viprah Technologie…
- **Other parties:** Insolvency and…; Corporate…; +6 more

## Timeline

- **01.08.2015 — Director Employment…**: Director Employment Agreement executed between Arul Prasad Senniappan and Viprah…
- **01.04.2017 — Date of D…**: Date of default claimed…

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclt-kolkata/arul-prasad-senniappan-vs-viprah-technologies-limited-419f7ed8