# M/S VIDRES INDIA CERAMICS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. M/S SANFORD VITRIFIED PRIVATE LIMITED

> NCLT judgment dated 2026-08-31. Citation: TCN-2026-NCLT-00912. M/s Vidres India Ceramics Private Limited (Operational Creditor) filed an application under…

- **Court:** NCLT
- **Order date:** 31 Aug 2026
- **Citation:** TCN-2026-NCLT-00912
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad/ms-vidres-india-ceramics-private-limited-vs-ms-sanford-vitrified-private-limited-nbemo

## Summary

### Background

M/s Vidres India Ceramics Private Limited (Operational Creditor) filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC against M/s Sanford Vitrified Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) for a default of Rs. 2,26,40,900/- arising from the supply of ceramic raw materials. The default occurred on 12.06.2025, and demand notices were served, but the Corporate Debtor failed to make payment or raise a dispute. The Corporate Debtor raised several objections regarding the maintainability of the application, including a premature Board Resolution, discrepancies in demand notice receipt dates, non-compliance with Section 9(3)(c), incomplete GST documents, and the sufficiency of evidence for the debt.

## Facts

M/s Vidres India Ceramics Private Limited (Operational Creditor) filed an application under Section 9 IBC against M/s Sanford Vitrified Private Limited (Corporate Debtor).

The default amount claimed is Rs. 2,26,40,900/-.

The default occurred on and from 12.06.2025.

The Operational Creditor is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, and is in the business of manufacturing and trading ceramic raw material.

The Corporate Debtor is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, manufacturing and trading ceramic and other related products.

The Operational Creditor supplied Ceramic Glaze Mix M and other raw materials to the Corporate Debtor.

…

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the application filed under Section 9 of the IBC is defective and not maintainable due to …

**Ratio:** The application is maintainable as the debt is overdue, and the respondent failed to

…

**Reasoning:** The court found that the underlying defaults exceeded the eligible limit, the application

…

**Interpretation:** Compliance with Sections 8 and 9 is crucial, but the court found the applicant

…

**Application:** The application was allowed,

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** Chitra Ha…; Velamur G Venkata…
- **Appellants:** M/S VIDRES INDIA…
- **Respondents:** M/S SANFORD…
- **Other parties:** Chetan…; Bhavi Shreyans…
- **Advocates:** Vijay Limb…; Pranav D. T…; +1 more

## Timeline

- **2025-05-05 — Board Resoluti…**: Applicant passed Board Resolutions authorizing its representatives to initiate and pursue…
- **2025-03-12 — Last Invoic…**: Date of the last invoice issued by the…

## Legal provisions

- [Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 9 — Application for initiation of corporate insolvency…](https://caseease.in/legal-provisions/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016/section-9)

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad/ms-vidres-india-ceramics-private-limited-vs-ms-sanford-vitrified-private-limited-nbemo