# Vijaybhai Dhanjibhai Detroja vs. Vidres India Ceramics Private Limited & Chetan Patel

> NCLAT judgment dated 2026-09-18. Citation: TCN-2026-NCLAT-00280. An appeal was filed by Vijaybhai Dhanjibhai Detroja, a shareholder and suspended director of…

- **Court:** NCLAT
- **Order date:** 18 Sept 2026
- **Citation:** TCN-2026-NCLAT-00280
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/vijaybhai-dhanjibhai-detroja-vs-vidres-india-ceramics-private-limited-ch-c7z06

## Summary

### Background

An appeal was filed by Vijaybhai Dhanjibhai Detroja, a shareholder and suspended director of Sanford Vitrified Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor), challenging an NCLT order dated 31.08.2026. This order admitted an application filed by Vidres India Ceramics Private Limited (Operational Creditor) under Section 9 of the IBC, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor and appointing Chetan Patel as Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The Operational Creditor had claimed an operational debt of ₹2,26,40,900/-.

## Facts

Mr. Vijaybhai Dhanjibhai Detroja, a shareholder and suspended Director of Sanford Vitrified Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor), filed an appeal under Section 61 of the IBC.

The appeal challenged an order dated 31.08.2026 by the NCLT, Ahmedabad Bench, which admitted an application under Section 9 of the IBC, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Sanford Vitrified Pvt. Ltd.

Vidres India Ceramics Private Limited (Respondent No. 1) is the Operational Creditor who instituted the Section 9 proceedings for an operational debt.

Mr. Chetan Patel (Respondent No. 2) was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) for M/s Sanford Vitrified Pvt. Ltd.

…

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal can, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Rule …

**Ratio:** The statutory mechanism for withdrawal of an admitted insolvency application under

…

**Reasoning:** The Tribunal noted that the settlement occurred after the CIRP admission order

…

**Interpretation:** The Appellate Tribunal interpreted Section 12A of the IBC, particularly its

…

**Application:** In the present case, despite the settlement between the Appellant and the

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** Mohammad Faiz…; Naresh Sa…
- **Appellants:** Vijaybhai…
- **Respondents:** M/s Sanford…; Vidres India…; +1 more
- **Other parties:** Analysis co…; HXsHnr3Ug9OhFhqk4g…
- **Advocates:** Keith Var…; Pranav Th…; +1 more

## Timeline

- **2024-09-18 — Start of Unpaid Bills…**: Period for which unpaid bills were raised by Vidres India Ceramics Private Limited,…
- **2025-03-12 — End of Unpaid Bills…**: End of the period for which unpaid bills were raised by Vidres India Ceramics Private…

## Legal provisions

- [Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61 — Appeals and Appellate Authority](https://caseease.in/legal-provisions/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016/section-61)

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/vijaybhai-dhanjibhai-detroja-vs-vidres-india-ceramics-private-limited-ch-c7z06