# In the matter of Sukumar Puvi Kumar vs Pavitra Vyas

> NCLAT judgment dated 2024-11-20. Citation: TCN-2024-NCLAT-00084. The case involves a Company Appeal (AT) (CH)(Ins) No.188/2023 before the National Company Law…

- **Court:** NCLAT
- **Order date:** 20 Nov 2024
- **Citation:** TCN-2024-NCLAT-00084
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/sukumar-puvi-kumar-vs-pavitra-vyas-352e5d4c

## Summary

### Background

The case involves a Company Appeal (AT) (CH)(Ins) No.188/2023 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal at Chennai. The appellant, Mr. Sukakumar Puvi, sought relief related to an interim order dated 11.07.2023. The respondent, Ms. Pavitra Vyas, sought clarification of the interim order. The appellant requested additional time to deposit an amount related to the interim order, which was seen as an admission of non-compliance.

## Facts

Mr. Sukakumar Puvi, the appellant, is the Suspended Director of Kavi Protein and Feed Pvt. Ltd. Ms. Pavitra Vyas, the respondent, is the RP of Kavi Protein and Feed Pvt. Ltd. The case concerns Company Appeal (AT) (CH)(Ins) No.188/2023. The respondent sought clarification of an interim order dated 11.07.2023. The appellant requested additional time to deposit an amount related to the interim order. The court considered the appellant's request as an admission of non-compliance with the interim order. The respondent's counsel requested that the application be treated as a stay vacation application. The court noted that the interim order had not been complied with within a reasonable timeframe. The Tribunal fixed 02.01.2025 for hearing of the matter.

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the appellant should be granted additional time to deposit the amount related to the …

**Ratio:** A party's request for additional time to comply with an order can be construed as an

…

**Reasoning:** The court reasoned that the appellant's request for additional time to deposit the amount

…

**Interpretation:** The interpretation is that a request for more time to comply with an order,

…

**Application:** The appellant's request for additional time was denied because it was

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** Sharad Kumar…; Jatindranat…
- **Appellants:** Sukakumar…
- **Respondents:** Kavi Protein and…; Pavitra…

## Timeline

- **2023-07-11 — Interim Ord…**: Date of the Interim Order for which…
- **2024-11-20 — Company Appea…**: Company Appeal listed…

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/sukumar-puvi-kumar-vs-pavitra-vyas-352e5d4c