# In the matter of Shapporji Pallonji and Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. . Kobra West Power Company Limited & Ors. COMPANY APPEAL (AT) (INSOLVENCY) NO. 816 of 2019

> NCLAT judgment dated 2023-02-23. Citation: TCN-2023-NCLAT-00702. The case involves an appeal against an order dated 24th June 2019, passed by the National…

- **Court:** NCLAT
- **Order date:** 23 Feb 2023
- **Citation:** TCN-2023-NCLAT-00702
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/shapporji-pallonji-and-co-pvt-ltd-vs-kobra-west-power-company-limited-ors-compan-11ad86bb

## Summary

### Background

The case involves an appeal against an order dated 24th June 2019, passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Ahmedabad Bench, in I.A. No. 236/2019 in C.P. (IB) No.-190/NCLT/AHM/2018. The NCLT had allowed IA 236/2019 filed by the Resolution Professional of the 'Corporate Debtor', Korba West Power Company Limited, seeking approval of the ‘Resolution Plan’. The Appellant, Shapporji Pallonji and Co. Pvt. Ltd., challenged this approval, arguing that their claim was rejected unfairly and without proper communication, despite pending arbitration proceedings.

## Facts

Shapporji Pallonji and Co. Pvt. Ltd. (Appellant) had ongoing arbitration proceedings with Korba West Power Company Limited (Corporate Debtor) before the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated by the Corporate Debtor itself under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Appellant submitted a claim of Rs.45,22,52,428/- in ‘Form-B' to the Resolution Professional (RP). The RP did not provide written communication regarding the status of the claim but uploaded the information on the Corporate Debtor's website. The Appellant argued that they were not properly informed of the rejection of their claim and that the RP lacked adjudicatory powers to reject claims. The Resolution Plan was approved on 24.06.2019. The Appellant filed an

…

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the Appellant, an Operational Creditor, can pursue Arbitration Proceedings after the …

**Ratio:** The ratio is based on the principle that claims which are not part of the Resolution Plan

…

**Reasoning:** The tribunal reasoned that the Resolution Plan was approved by the Adjudicating

…

**Interpretation:** The interpretation is that while the approval of a Resolution Plan generally

…

**Application:** In this case, the tribunal allowed the Appellant to pursue the pending

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** Anant Bijay…; Shreesha…; +1 more
- **Appellants:** Shapporji…
- **Respondents:** Korba West Power…; Kobra West Power…
- **Advocates:** Abhijeet…; Sonali Jaitley…; +10 more

## Timeline

- **2018-07-26 — Adjudicating Authority…**: The Adjudicating Authority imposed a Memorandum, and the Arbitration Proceedings were…
- **2018-11-01 — RP Updates Cla…**: The Resolution Professional first updated…

## Legal provisions

- [Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61(3) — Appeals and Appellate Authority](https://caseease.in/legal-provisions/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016/section-61)

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/shapporji-pallonji-and-co-pvt-ltd-vs-kobra-west-power-company-limited-ors-compan-11ad86bb
