# In the matter of Sanjeev Sangal vs. Apex Heights Pvt. Ltd.

> NCLAT judgment dated 2026-04-21. Citation: TCN-2026-NCLAT-00118. The case involves an appeal against an order dated 27.11.2024 passed by the National Company…

- **Court:** NCLAT
- **Order date:** 21 Apr 2026
- **Citation:** TCN-2026-NCLAT-00118
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/sanjeev-sangal-vs-apex-heights-pvt-ltd-0f5a2008

## Summary

### Background

The case involves an appeal against an order dated 27.11.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi, in IA No. 1929 of 2024 in CP (IB) No. 496/ND/2018. The appellant, Sanjeev Sangal, a homebuyer and unsecured financial creditor of Maple Realcon Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor), is seeking possession of a flat in the 'Misty Heights' project. The NCLT directed the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) not to create third-party rights over the flat and to conduct verification of documents.

## Facts

Sanjeev Sangal, the appellant, is a homebuyer and an unsecured financial creditor of Maple Realcon Pvt. Ltd.

The appellant purchased a flat in the 'Misty Heights' project for Rs. 47,00,000 and made full payment.

The CIRP of Maple Realcon Pvt. Ltd. commenced on 18.07.2018.

The appellant filed Form C on 06.08.2018, attaching his BBA and Payment Receipts.

The Resolution Professional (RP) admitted the appellant's claim on 01.12.2018.

The Resolution Plan was approved by the CoC with an 89.07% vote and by the Ld. AA on 20.02.2020.

The Resolution Plan included a verification clause allowing the SRA to verify original documents.

The SRA did not carry out verification within the stipulated 60 days.

…

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the SRA can re-scrutinize the Appellant's claim after the Resolution Plan has been approved …

**Ratio:** The SRA cannot re-scrutinize the Appellant's claim after the Resolution Plan has been

…

**Reasoning:** The Resolution Plan becomes binding on all stakeholders after approval. The SRA is

…

**Interpretation:** The verification clause cannot be interpreted to allow the SRA to indefinitely

…

**Application:** The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** N. Sesha…; Arun Ba…
- **Appellants:** Sanjeev S…
- **Respondents:** Maple Realcon…; M/s Apex Heights…
- **Other parties:** DINESH CHANDRA…
- **Advocates:** Ishaan C…; Saurabh…; +4 more

## Timeline

- **2018-07-18 — CIRP Commen…**: CIRP of Maple Realcon…
- **2018-08-06 — Claim Fi…**: The appellant filed Form C,…

## Legal provisions

- [Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61 — Appeals and Appellate Authority](https://caseease.in/legal-provisions/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016/section-61)

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/sanjeev-sangal-vs-apex-heights-pvt-ltd-0f5a2008