# In the matter of Ravi Raman vs. R R Info Park Pvt Ltd & Anr.

> NCLAT judgment dated 2024-03-07. Citation: TCN-2024-NCLAT-00590. The case is a Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.78/2024 filed at the National Company Law…

- **Court:** NCLAT
- **Order date:** 7 Mar 2024
- **Citation:** TCN-2024-NCLAT-00590
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/ravi-raman-vs-r-r-info-park-pvt-ltd-anr-cbd45ae9

## Summary

### Background

The case is a Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.78/2024 filed at the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in Chennai. The appeal involves IA No.227/2024, IA No.228/2024, and IA No.226/2024. The appeal was filed by Ravi Raman against R R Info Park Pvt Ltd & Anr. The court heard the arguments and provided directions for filing of replies, rejoinders, and notes of submissions.

## Facts

Ravi Raman filed a Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.78/2024 against R R Info Park Pvt Ltd & Anr. The appeal also involves IA No.227/2024, IA No.228/2024, and IA No.226/2024. The NCLAT Chennai heard the parties on 2024-03-07. The respondents were granted time to file their replies/responses/counter/status reports within two weeks. The appellant was given four days after receiving the respondents' replies to file a rejoinder. Both parties were directed to file Notes of Submissions before the next hearing. The 'Impugned Order' dated 2023-12-12 passed by the NCLT Division Bench-I Chennai in IBA/930/CHE/2019 was deferred. The matter was listed for further hearing on 2024-03-28.

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the respondents should be granted time to file their Vakalat/Reply/Response/Counter/Status …

**Ratio:** The court has the discretion to grant time to parties to file necessary documents to

…

**Reasoning:** The court granted time to the respondents to file their

…

**Interpretation:** The court's interpretation is that granting time for filing documents is

…

**Application:** The court applied this principle by granting the respondents two weeks to file

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** M. Venu…; Sharad Kumar…; +1 more
- **Appellants:** Ravi R…
- **Respondents:** R R Info Park Pvt…
- **Advocates:** P.H. Arvindh…; Kumar Anura…; +5 more

## Timeline

- **2023-12-12 — Impugned Ord…**: Date of the 'Impugned Order' passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority'/NCLT Division Bench-I…
- **2024-03-07 — Hearing…**: Hearing of Comp. App.…

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/ravi-raman-vs-r-r-info-park-pvt-ltd-anr-cbd45ae9