# in the matter of Nikhil Mehta & Sons (HUF) & Ors. Vs. AMR Infrastructure Ltd. CA (AT) No. 7-2017

> NCLAT judgment dated 2017-08-09. Citation: TCN-2017-NCLAT-00140. This is an appeal case before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning…

- **Court:** NCLAT
- **Order date:** 9 Aug 2017
- **Citation:** TCN-2017-NCLAT-00140
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/nikhil-mehta-sons-huf-ors-vs-amr-infrastructure-ltd-ca-264a992e

## Summary

### Background

This is an appeal case before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning typographical errors in a judgment dated July 21, 2017. The appellant's counsel pointed out these errors, which include incorrect naming of parties and a project name within the judgment.

## Facts

The case involves an appeal regarding typographical errors in a judgment dated July 21, 2017. The errors include the incorrect naming of the parties in the cause title as "Nikhil Mehta & Sons v. AMR Infrastructures Limited" instead of "Nikhil Mehta & Sons (HUF) & Ors. V. AMR Infrastructures Limited". Another error involves the incorrect naming of a project as "Kessel-I Valley, one Mall and One Home" instead of "Kessel-I Valley, I Mall and I Homes". Additionally, there was an error in para 21 regarding the description of amounts deposited by investors. These errors were brought to the court's attention by the appellant's counsel.

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the typographical errors in the judgment …

**Ratio:** Courts have the inherent power to correct clerical or typographical errors to ensure the

…

**Reasoning:** The court acknowledged the errors pointed out by the appellant's counsel and found them

…

**Interpretation:** This confirms the court's authority to rectify errors that do not alter the

…

**Application:** The court applied this principle by directing the registry to correct the

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** S.J. Mukhop…; Balvinder…
- **Appellants:** Nikhil Mehta &…
- **Respondents:** AMR Infrastructure…

## Timeline

- **2017-07-21 — Original Judgm…**: The date of the original judgment…
- **2017-08-09 — Appellant Points Out…**: Appellant's counsel pointed out…

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/nikhil-mehta-sons-huf-ors-vs-amr-infrastructure-ltd-ca-264a992e