# In the matter of M.S Luvish Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Rohit Sehgal CA(AT)(Ins)No.1202-2019

> NCLAT judgment dated 2019-11-11. Citation: TCN-2019-NCLAT-00158. The case involves an appeal against an order passed in CA-1776(PB)/2019 (actually…

- **Court:** NCLAT
- **Order date:** 11 Nov 2019
- **Citation:** TCN-2019-NCLAT-00158
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/ms-luvish-construction-pvt-ltd-ors-vs-rohit-sehgal-ca-5c87fdc2

## Summary

### Background

The case involves an appeal against an order passed in CA-1776(PB)/2019 (actually CA-1176(PB)/2019) on a petition filed by the Resolution Professional. The appellant, M. S. Luvish Construction Pvt. Ltd., is the landlord of the Corporate Debtor. The grievance of the Appellants is against the order passed in CA-1776(PB)/2019.

## Facts

M. S. Luvish Construction Pvt. Ltd. is the landlord of the Corporate Debtor. The rest of the Appellants are three Directors and one sister concern of the 1st Appellant. The grievance of the Appellants is against the order passed in CA-1776(PB)/2019 (actually CA-1176(PB)/2019) on the petition filed by the Resolution Professional. The Adjudicating Authority has not considered the question of maintainability of the application filed by the Resolution Professional. The non applicant-respondent No.4 to 8 has been filed but they have not disclosed the entry in the Bank account in order to effectively adjudicate on the issue raised in the application. The non applicant-respondent – 4 to 8 shall file the Bank account statement within ten days with a copy in advance to the

…

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the Adjudicating Authority considered the question of maintainability of the application …

**Ratio:** The Adjudicating Authority is responsible for considering the maintainability of

…

**Reasoning:** The appellate tribunal declined to comment on the maintainability issue because the

…

**Interpretation:** The appellate tribunal acknowledged the Adjudicating Authority's role in

…

**Application:** The ratio and reasoning suggest that the Adjudicating Authority must address

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** S.J. Mukhop…; Venugop…; +1 more
- **Appellants:** M. S. Luvish…
- **Respondents:** Rohit S…

## Timeline

- **2019-11-11 — Appellant's Su…**: Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that 1st Appellant ‘M/s M. S. Luvish…
- **2019-10-31 — List for further…**: List for further…

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/ms-luvish-construction-pvt-ltd-ors-vs-rohit-sehgal-ca-5c87fdc2