# In the matter of Debashish Nanda VS D.P. Garg and Company Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. CA(AT)(Insolvency)26-2019

> NCLAT judgment dated 2019-04-23. Citation: TCN-2019-NCLAT-00654. The 'Resolution Professional' filed an appeal against the order dated January 22, 2019. The…

- **Court:** NCLAT
- **Order date:** 23 Apr 2019
- **Citation:** TCN-2019-NCLAT-00654
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/debashish-nanda-vs-dp-garg-and-company-pvt-ltd-ors-ca-60bb1b2b

## Summary

### Background

The 'Resolution Professional' filed an appeal against the order dated January 22, 2019. The order pertained to the execution of a local commission for releasing the applicant's goods from the Corporate Debtor's premises. The local commissioner was appointed to ensure no impediments during property identification by five applicants. The RP was directed to ensure goods release upon document verification and applicant identification. The RP cited being busy as a reason for non-execution, which was deemed unacceptable.

## Facts

The Resolution Professional (RP) filed an appeal against an order dated January 22, 2019, which concerned the execution of a local commission. The order directed the RP to release the applicant's goods located on the Corporate Debtor's premises. A local commissioner was appointed to oversee the identification of the property by five applicants. The RP was instructed to release the goods after verifying documents and identifying each applicant. The RP stated that the commission could not be executed due to being busy, which was deemed unacceptable. The RP's counsel requested another opportunity to execute the commission. The court noted that the properties had been verified by the Local Commissioner and a Compliance Report had been submitted to the Adjudicating

…

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the court should interfere with the impugned order regarding the execution of the local …

**Ratio:** Appellate courts generally defer to the decisions of lower courts unless there is a clear

…

**Reasoning:** The court stated that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order, implying

…

**Interpretation:** This reflects a standard principle of appellate review, where deference is

…

**Application:** The court applied this principle by choosing not to intervene in the order

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** S.J. Mukhop…; A.I.S. C…; +1 more
- **Appellants:** Debashish…
- **Respondents:** D.P. Garg & Co.…

## Timeline

- **2019-01-22 — Original Ord…**: The order was issued directing the RP to release the applicant's goods lying in the…
- **2019-01-10 — Order Date Reg…**: Vide order dated 10th January 2019, the RP was directed to release the applicant's goods…

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/debashish-nanda-vs-dp-garg-and-company-pvt-ltd-ors-ca-60bb1b2b