# In the matter of Committee of Creditors of Leel Electricals Ltd. Vs. Arvind Mittal, IRP of Leel Electricals Ltd. Contempt Case (AT) No. 01 of 2021 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1100 of 2020

> NCLAT judgment dated 2021-01-29. Citation: TCN-2021-NCLAT-00389. The case involves a contempt case before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)…

- **Court:** NCLAT
- **Order date:** 29 Jan 2021
- **Citation:** TCN-2021-NCLAT-00389
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/committee-of-creditors-of-leel-electricals-ltd-vs-arvind-mittal-irp-of-leel-elec-8ff2aa77

## Summary

### Background

The case involves a contempt case before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning the handing over of records by the Resolution Professional. The appellant claimed non-compliance with the tribunal's directions. The appellant is the Committee of Creditors of Leel Electricals Ltd. and the respondent is Arvind Mittal, IRP of Leel Electricals Ltd.

## Facts

The Committee of Creditors of Leel Electricals Ltd. filed a contempt case against Arvind Mittal, IRP of Leel Electricals Ltd., alleging non-compliance with the NCLAT's directions regarding the handing over of records. During the proceedings, the appellant's advocate, Mr. Ankur Mittal, admitted that the directions had been complied with. Furthermore, Mr. Mittal stated that the appellant is in the process of approaching the IBBI (Regulator) to take action against Mr. Arvind Mittal, IRP. Given the compliance and the ongoing action with the IBBI, the NCLAT concluded that nothing survived for consideration in the contempt case.

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the contempt case against Arvind Mittal, IRP, should be continued given the appellant's …

**Ratio:** When the directions of a tribunal have been complied with and further action is being

…

**Reasoning:** The court reasoned that since the appellant admitted compliance with the directions

…

**Interpretation:** This implies that once compliance is achieved and alternative remedies are

…

**Application:** In this case, the appellant's admission of compliance and their pursuit of

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** Bansi Lal…; Ashok Kumar…; +1 more
- **Appellants:** Committee of…
- **Respondents:** Leel Electricals…; Arvind Mittal,…
- **Advocates:** Ankur M…; Meera M…; +2 more

## Timeline

- **2021-01-29 — Order Da…**: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate representing the Appellant admits that the direction passed by…

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/committee-of-creditors-of-leel-electricals-ltd-vs-arvind-mittal-irp-of-leel-elec-8ff2aa77