# Anuj Goyal vs. Resolution Professional & Ors.

> NCLAT judgment dated 2026-07-01. Citation: TCN-2026-NCLAT-00219. The appellant, Anuj Goyal, filed an appeal challenging an order dated 09.06.2026 passed by…

- **Court:** NCLAT
- **Order date:** 1 Jul 2026
- **Citation:** TCN-2026-NCLAT-00219
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/anuj-goyal-vs-resolution-professional-ors-q78n1

## Summary

### Background

The appellant, Anuj Goyal, filed an appeal challenging an order dated 09.06.2026 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Chandigarh Bench. The impugned order reserved the plan approval application for orders. The appellant contended that the NCLT should have first decided two Interlocutory Applications (I.A. No. 1442/2025 & I.A. No. 1718/2025) as per a previous National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) order dated 23.04.2026, before reserving orders on the plan approval application.

## Facts

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 1083/2026 was filed by Anuj Goyal challenging an order dated 09.06.2026.

The impugned order was passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Chandigarh Bench, Court I, in IA(IBC)(PLAN)/6(CH) 2024.

The impugned order reserved the plan approval application for orders.

The appellant contended that the NCLAT, vide order dated 23.04.2026 in Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 624/2026, directed the adjudicating authority to dispose of I.A. No. 1442/2025 & I.A. No. 1718/2025 before deciding the plan approval application.

Orders on I.A. No. 1442/2025 & I.A. No. 1718/2025 were reserved by the Adjudicating Authority on 03.06.2026.

The plan approval application was heard and orders reserved by the Adjudicating Authority on 09.06.2026.

…

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the Adjudicating Authority erred by reserving orders on the plan approval application on …

**Ratio:** The Adjudicating Authority did not err in reserving orders on the plan approval

…

**Reasoning:** The Tribunal reviewed its own order dated 23.04.2026 and found that it merely granted

…

**Interpretation:** The phrase "liberty is given to the Appellant to bring into notice... and

…

**Application:** The appellant's contention that the Adjudicating Authority was obligated to

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** Ashok Bh…; Barun M…
- **Appellants:** Anuj G…; Homebu…
- **Respondents:** Chandigarh…; Resolution…; +1 more
- **Other parties:** CoC…
- **Advocates:** Anand Chh…; Abhimanyu B…; +16 more

## Timeline

- **2026-04-23 — Previous NCLA…**: NCLAT passed an order in Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 624/2026, granting liberty to the…
- **2026-06-03 — I.A. Orders R…**: Adjudicating Authority reserved orders on…

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/nclat-new-delhi/anuj-goyal-vs-resolution-professional-ors-q78n1