# In the matter of Sandeep Jajodia Vs. IDBI Bank & Ors, W. P. (C) No. 49/2022

> HC judgment dated 2022-03-07. Citation: TCN-2022-HC-00058. The case involves a petition filed in the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The petitioner contends…

- **Court:** HC
- **Order date:** 7 Mar 2022
- **Citation:** TCN-2022-HC-00058
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/high-courts-new-delhi/sandeep-jajodia-vs-idbi-bank-ors-w-p-e3785c4d

## Summary

### Background

The case involves a petition filed in the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The petitioner contends that proceedings against the corporate person were launched in Mumbai and that a notification dated 12th July 2018 provided for proceedings against corporate persons of Chhattisgarh to be filed in Cuttack. However, the notification did not provide for the transfer of pending proceedings against corporate persons of Chhattisgarh from Mumbai to Cuttack. The petitioner seeks interim protection.

## Facts

Sandeep Jajodia filed a petition in the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The petitioner's counsel argued that proceedings against the corporate person were initiated in Mumbai. A notification dated 12th July 2018 allowed proceedings against corporate persons of Chhattisgarh to be filed in Cuttack, but it did not address the transfer of pending proceedings from Mumbai. The petitioner seeks interim protection. IDBI Bank and another are the opposite parties. The Union of India was added as a party. The court directed the opposite parties to file counters by March 28, 2022, and the petitioner to file a rejoinder by April 4, 2022. The Union of India is expected to state its position regarding the interpretation of the July 12, 2018 notification.

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether the proceedings against the corporate …

**Ratio:** The ratio is based on the interpretation of the notification dated 12th July 2018 and its

…

**Reasoning:** The court's reasoning will depend on the interpretation of the notification and whether

…

**Interpretation:** The interpretation involves understanding the scope and applicability of the

…

**Application:** The application involves applying the interpretation of the notification to the

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** Arindam…
- **Appellants:** Sandeep J…
- **Respondents:** IDBI…
- **Advocates:** R. Bane…; Jagannath P…; +2 more

## Timeline

- **2022-01-10 — Order Da…**: Contentions of parties will appear from…
- **2022-02-21 — Order Da…**: Contentions of parties will appear from…

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/high-courts-new-delhi/sandeep-jajodia-vs-idbi-bank-ors-w-p-e3785c4d