# In the matter of Pantnagar Snehdeep Cooperative Housing Society Vs Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority

> HC judgment dated 2024-06-28. Citation: TCN-2024-HC-00065. The case involves two writ petitions, 650 of 2024 and 17803 of 2024, both concerning the same…

- **Court:** HC
- **Order date:** 28 Jun 2024
- **Citation:** TCN-2024-HC-00065
- **Category:** IBC
- **Source page:** https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/high-courts-new-delhi/pantnagar-snehdeep-cooperative-housing-society-vs-maharashtra-housing-area-devel-5da0aefa

## Summary

### Background

The case involves two writ petitions, 650 of 2024 and 17803 of 2024, both concerning the same project and related to issues with the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA). Writ Petition 650/2024 addresses the petitioner's grievance that MHADA has not considered their representation regarding the abandonment of the project by the developer. Writ Petition 17803/2024 concerns the non-implementation of a Government Resolution (GR) related to developers abandoning redevelopment projects.

## Facts

Pantnagar Snehdeep Co-operative Housing Society filed Writ Petition No. 650 of 2024, alleging that the CEO of Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA) failed to consider their representation. The petitioner claimed that the developer had abandoned the project, necessitating action for substitution. Madhusudan Mahadevrao Ghewde & Ors filed Writ Petition (L) No. 17803 of 2024, also against MHADA, complaining about the non-implementation of a Government Resolution (GR) dated 4th March 2024 concerning developers abandoning redevelopment projects. Both petitions relate to the same project. The members of the society had vacated the premises in 2016, but there was no progress in the redevelopment scheme.

## Issues and analysis

### Issue 1: Whether MHADA should be directed to consider the representations made by the petitioners regarding …

**Ratio:** The principle is that administrative bodies like MHADA have a duty to consider

…

**Reasoning:** The court reasoned that MHADA had not adequately addressed the petitioner's

…

**Interpretation:** This issue involves the interpretation of the administrative duties of MHADA

…

**Application:** The court applied this principle by directing MHADA to dispose of the

…

## Parties

- **Judges:** M.S. S…; Kamal K…
- **Appellants:** Pantnagar…
- **Respondents:** CEO Maharashtra…
- **Other parties:** Kohi…

## Timeline

- **2023-12-27 — Petitioner's Representat…**: The Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 650 of 2024 sent a representation through their…
- **2024-03-04 — Government Resolution…**: Government Resolution (GR) issued by the Government in the context of dealing with…

---

This is a preview. The full structured summary, issues, precedents and source judgment are available on CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified: https://caseease.in/cases/ibc/high-courts-new-delhi/pantnagar-snehdeep-cooperative-housing-society-vs-maharashtra-housing-area-devel-5da0aefa
